RE: Draft 1.9 // synthesis encoding vs state_machine

Subject: RE: Draft 1.9 // synthesis encoding vs state_machine
From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
Date: Fri Feb 01 2002 - 01:55:26 PST

Next message: Jayaram Bhasker: "RE: (* synthesis, keep [=<optional_value>] *)"
Previous message: VhdlCohen@aol.com: "Re: Draft 1.9 // synthesis encoding vs state_machine"
In reply to: Jayaram Bhasker: "RE: Draft 1.9 // synthesis encoding vs state_machine"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Jayaram Bhasker wrote:

> (* synthesis, fsm_state=<encoding_scheme> *) -- applies to a reg.

should be something like

"fsm_state[=<encoding_scheme>]"

-- 
Shalom Bresticker                           Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
Principal Staff Engineer                               Tel: +972 9 9522268
Motorola Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                    Fax: +972 9 9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                       Cell: +972 50 441478

Next message: Jayaram Bhasker: "RE: (* synthesis, keep [=<optional_value>] *)"
Previous message: VhdlCohen@aol.com: "Re: Draft 1.9 // synthesis encoding vs state_machine"
In reply to: Jayaram Bhasker: "RE: Draft 1.9 // synthesis encoding vs state_machine"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Feb 01 2002 - 02:05:41 PST