Subject: Re: 1364.1 pragmas
From: David Bishop (dbishop@server.vhdl.org)
Date: Wed Sep 04 2002 - 05:05:17 PDT
To: John Michael Williams <jwill@AstraGate.net>
cc: vlog-synth@server.eda.org, Daryl.Stewart@tenisontech.com, etf@boyd.com
From: Daryl.Stewart@tenisontech.com
Reply-To: Daryl.Stewart@tenisontech.com
Subject: Re: 1364.1 pragmas
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Sep 2002 09:48:34 PDT."
<3D74E7E2.AA205D7C@AstraGate.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 11:25:20 +0100
Sender: Daryl.Stewart@cl.cam.ac.uk
> Hi Dave.
Actually it was Daryl - my email got filtered through Dave at vlog-synth
> You are missing my point entirely:
I believe so! My apologies. It had become a long thread ;)
> Now, with this, any tool such as a simulation compiler,
> will completely ignore the tokenization if it is not
> programmed to parse the content.
<snip>
That was a clearer description: I think I'm on your side now. This would have
been a nice way to make V2K1 compliant code a bit more backward compatible for
those who own old tools.
I doubt this can go through now though?
cheers
Daryl
Tenison Technology
Hardware and software working together
Tel: +44 1223 763596
Email: Daryl.Stewart@tenisontech.com
Web: www.tenisontech.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Sep 04 2002 - 05:17:36 PDT