Re: assigning 'X'

Subject: Re: assigning 'X'
From: Shalom Bresticker (Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com)
Date: Mon Apr 29 2002 - 22:49:15 PDT

• Next message: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: assigning 'X'"
• Previous message: Jayaram Bhasker: "RE: Draft D2.2 for ballot"
• In reply to: Muzaffer Kal: "assigning 'X'"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

In the minutes of the April 5 meeting, Jayaram Bhasker wrote:

> 2. "Assigning X" issue posted by MKal: Muzaffer mentioned that he had posted based on an old draft and
> that there was no longer an issue.

Can someone please clarify for me why "there is no longer an issue" ?

Sorry I am responding to this only now.

Thanks,
Shalom

Muzaffer Kal wrote:

> I think 1364.1 and the "RTL coding styles that yield simulation and
> synthesis mismatches" document are not consistent in this area. 1364.1 says
> that "the value x may be used as a primary on the RHS ..." in Section 5.5
> "Support for values x and z" and in Section 6.1.1 "Case decoding attributes"
> last example it is claimed that assigning X is "much safer" than a full
> case. But in Section 5.1 Assigning ?X? of the RCSTYS&SM, this is highly
> discouraged. I think we need to somehow make these two attitudes consistent.

--
Shalom Bresticker                           Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
Principal Staff Engineer                               Tel: +972 9 9522268
Motorola Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                    Fax: +972 9 9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                       Cell: +972 50 441478

• Next message: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: assigning 'X'"
• Previous message: Jayaram Bhasker: "RE: Draft D2.2 for ballot"
• In reply to: Muzaffer Kal: "assigning 'X'"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Apr 29 2002 - 22:52:58 PDT