RE: Verilog Synthesis BNF - Please Review and Vote - Votes due 04/19/2002

Subject: RE: Verilog Synthesis BNF - Please Review and Vote - Votes due 04/19/2002
From: Muzaffer Kal (kal@dspia.com)
Date: Mon Apr 15 2002 - 22:12:20 PDT

• Next message: Stefen Boyd: "RE: Verilog Synthesis BNF - Please Review and Vote - Votes due 04/19/2002"
• Previous message: Ken Coffman: "Re: Verilog Synthesis BNF - Please Review and Vote - Votes due 04/19/2002"
• In reply to: Clifford E. Cummings: "Verilog Synthesis BNF - Please Review and Vote - Votes due 04/19/2002"
• Reply: Stefen Boyd: "RE: Verilog Synthesis BNF - Please Review and Vote - Votes due 04/19/2002"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I vote yes for corrected BNF

Better to have one right, one wrong than two wrongs. And we need to add a
footnote saying that vlog-synth standard has it right and vlog-2001 will fix
it too.

• Next message: Stefen Boyd: "RE: Verilog Synthesis BNF - Please Review and Vote - Votes due 04/19/2002"
• Previous message: Ken Coffman: "Re: Verilog Synthesis BNF - Please Review and Vote - Votes due 04/19/2002"
• In reply to: Clifford E. Cummings: "Verilog Synthesis BNF - Please Review and Vote - Votes due 04/19/2002"
• Reply: Stefen Boyd: "RE: Verilog Synthesis BNF - Please Review and Vote - Votes due 04/19/2002"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Apr 15 2002 - 22:13:27 PDT