Hi, > a) Mantis 2575, ballot comment #55: > Seems like there may be a copy/paste error here. According > to my copy of the spreadsheet, comment #55 is: > Is a class parameter implicitly "public" and "static"? > That clearly IS related to 2575, whereas the annotation > in Mehdi's email looks wrong to me. You're correct, we have discussed this separately. > b) Mantis 1486, ballot comment #190: > Did we really settle for "no change required"? I attached > a proposal to Mantis, and I don't recall discussing it > at Monday's meeting. I'm fine with "no change" if everyone > else is happy with that.... I don't know about this one. Shalom --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Jun 4 08:32:26 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 04 2009 - 08:33:15 PDT