[sv-ec] BNF problem with 2575 proposal

Shalom wrote:

> If I had a vote, I would vote NO on Mantis 2575 for the reason 
> detailed in a bug note:
> 
> The proposal makes the following BNF change:
> FROM
> constant_primary ::=
> ...
> | ps_parameter_identifier constant_select
> TO
> constant_primary ::=
> ...
> | [package_scope | class_scope] parameter_identifier constant_select
[...]
>
> It seems to me more logical to make the change in 
ps_parameter_identifier:
> 
> ps_parameter_identifier ::=
>   [ package_scope | class_scope ] parameter_identifier
> | { generate_block_identifier [ [ constant_expression ] ] . } 
> parameter_identifier

I agree, and will vote NO for this reason.
-- 
Jonathan Bromley



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.