In the sv-ec conference call held June 1st, Arturo mentioned that he didn't completely agree. Hopefully Arturo will have time to provide more details. Neil On 06/04/09 08:01, jonathan.bromley@doulos.com wrote: > Shalom wrote: > >> If I had a vote, I would vote NO on Mantis 2575 for the reason >> detailed in a bug note: >> >> The proposal makes the following BNF change: >> FROM >> constant_primary ::= >> ... >> | ps_parameter_identifier constant_select >> TO >> constant_primary ::= >> ... >> | [package_scope | class_scope] parameter_identifier constant_select > [...] >> It seems to me more logical to make the change in > ps_parameter_identifier: >> ps_parameter_identifier ::= >> [ package_scope | class_scope ] parameter_identifier >> | { generate_block_identifier [ [ constant_expression ] ] . } >> parameter_identifier > > I agree, and will vote NO for this reason. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sat Jun 6 12:06:55 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jun 06 2009 - 12:07:38 PDT