Re: [sv-ec] E-mail Ballot Due Wenesday, June 10, 8AM PDT

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


1.  Mantis 2693

    Ballot comment #138: Virtual interface in coverpoint?
    Yes _x_ No ___ Abstain ___

2.  Mantis 2598   [this mantis item is duplicate of 2575, but it was decided
        to vote on this]

    Ballot comment #52 How can class type parameters be accessed?
    Close as a duplicate of 2575
    Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___

    Ballot comment #64 Access to class type parameters
    Close as a duplicate of 2575
    Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___

[Neil] The proposals should be deleted, if the resolution of duplicate 
       is approved. 


3.  Mantis 2575

      Ballot comment #50 Is this.<param_name> or handle.<param_name> allowed for
      class parameters or local parameters of a class?
    Yes ___ No _X_ Abstain ___


[Neil] In 8.5, I would like to see an example of the use of a "local value
parameter name with an instance name". Perhaps a slight rewording of the 
proposed new text would help here. It can take a few readings of the 
currently proposed sentence to know how to parse it properly. In the proposed
text, both of the words "class" and "name" apply to both "value parameter"
and "local value parameter". This isn't immediately obvious.


Page 1, subclause 8.5
From: 
...the class value parameter or local value parameter name with... 
  To:
...a value parameter name or a local value parameter name with...


      Ballot comment #52 How can class type parameters be accessed?

The actual ballet comment #52 is the following:
"can super be applied to class parameters or local params?"

    Yes ___ No _X_ Abstain ___


[Neil] I have a similar rewording comment here. 

Page 2, first para with blue text. 
From: 
...class value parameters or local value parameters of the base class...
  To:
...value parameters or local value parameters of the base class...


      Ballot comment #55 Related to specification of hierarchical class methods
      for triggerring.

The actual ballet comment #55 is the following:
Is a class parameter implicitly "public" and "static"  

    Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___


      Ballot comment #59 can :: or . be applied to access a class parameter or a
      param declared inside the class?
    Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___


      Ballot comment #64 Access to class type parameters
    Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___


[Neil] I did not review the issue that Shalom raised with the BNF changes. 



4.  Mantis 2608
    Ballot Comment #59 :: access and dot access to class value parameters and
    local parameters should be allowed

    Close as a duplicate of 2575
    Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___


5.  Mantis 2746
    Ballot comment #113 "others" coverage bin example
    Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___


6.  Mantis 2749
    Ballot comment #53 class properties and methods are public
    Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___


7.  Mantis 2750
    Ballot comment #121 "expression" should be "constant_expression"
    Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___

8.  Mantis 2748
    Ballot comment #19 Preponed PLI region not included (but should be removed
    from LRM anyway as it does not really exist)

    No change required.
    See the bug note for an explanation as to why the figure does not need
    to be updated.
    Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___


9.  Mantis 2745
    Ballot comment #111 impicit coverpoint for cross
    An enhancement request
    Move to "Status=Resolved, Resolution=Open" and add the following bug note.

    "The committee read and considered this feedback. the committee believes it
     is too broad for the scope of the draft to implement at this time but may
     be considered for future revisions."
    Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___

[Neil]Since this is an enhancement request, I suggest setting the mantis to: 
      Status=resolved 
      Resolution=open
      Doing this will allow it to be reopened at some point in the future. 
      Ballot comments that aren't addressed at this time will most likely be
      reopened if there is another PAR.


10.  Mantis 1575
    Ballot comment #105, 110: can we use net in expressions variable or
    expresson.
    NO change needed.

    Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___

[Neil]Suggest the following 
      Status=resolved 
      Resolution=open


11.  Mantis 2694
    Ballot comment #140: this is out of scope of this version.
    NO change needed.

    Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___

[Neil]Suggest the following 
      Status=resolved 
      Resolution=open
      Mark as an enhancement request.


12.  Mantis 1486
    Ballot comment #190: this is out of scope of this version.
    NO change needed.

    Yes ___ No _X_ Abstain ___

[Neil] I vote yes for the proposal that is there. 


13.  Mantis 2744
    Ballot comment #109:
    NO change needed.

    Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___


[Neil] an explanation needs to be provided as a bug note.