Francoise inquired whether anybody at Cadence was responsible for ballot comment #134, and someone said it was their comment. They said that our response (that hierarchical names in a bind at the compilation unit scope levels were full hierarchical names) addressed their comment. They said it would be great if the LRM clarified this hierarchical resolution. So this does not appear to be a request for binding based on hierarchical names starting with a module name. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Jun 4 12:11:28 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 04 2009 - 12:12:17 PDT