Re: [sv-ec] Questions about the current EC email vote

From: Neil Korpusik <Neil.Korpusik_at_.....>
Date: Thu Jun 04 2009 - 18:24:31 PDT
This is what I have recorded in the minutes for 1486:

      Mantis 1486  id #190

       Jonathan  - has written a proposal for this one.

AI/Mehdi - put up for email vote.


As far as the description for mantis 2575, comment #55 is concerned.
The text in the email vote is not correct. We discussed this in the
June 1st conference call. The correct description is:

   Is a class parameter implicitly "public" and "static"


Neil





On 06/04/09 08:01, jonathan.bromley@doulos.com wrote:
> Sorry to nitpick, but there are a couple of things I didn't follow:
> 
> a) Mantis 2575, ballot comment #55:
> Seems like there may be a copy/paste error here.  According
> to my copy of the spreadsheet, comment #55 is:
>     Is a class parameter implicitly "public" and "static"?
> That clearly IS related to 2575, whereas the annotation
> in Mehdi's email looks wrong to me.
> 
> b) Mantis 1486, ballot comment #190:
> Did we really settle for "no change required"?  I attached
> a proposal to Mantis, and I don't recall discussing it
> at Monday's meeting.  I'm fine with "no change" if everyone
> else is happy with that....

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Jun 4 18:25:50 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 04 2009 - 18:27:12 PDT