This is what I have recorded in the minutes for 1486: Mantis 1486 id #190 Jonathan - has written a proposal for this one. AI/Mehdi - put up for email vote. As far as the description for mantis 2575, comment #55 is concerned. The text in the email vote is not correct. We discussed this in the June 1st conference call. The correct description is: Is a class parameter implicitly "public" and "static" Neil On 06/04/09 08:01, jonathan.bromley@doulos.com wrote: > Sorry to nitpick, but there are a couple of things I didn't follow: > > a) Mantis 2575, ballot comment #55: > Seems like there may be a copy/paste error here. According > to my copy of the spreadsheet, comment #55 is: > Is a class parameter implicitly "public" and "static"? > That clearly IS related to 2575, whereas the annotation > in Mehdi's email looks wrong to me. > > b) Mantis 1486, ballot comment #190: > Did we really settle for "no change required"? I attached > a proposal to Mantis, and I don't recall discussing it > at Monday's meeting. I'm fine with "no change" if everyone > else is happy with that.... -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Jun 4 18:25:50 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 04 2009 - 18:27:12 PDT