[sv-bc] Re: [sv-ec] logic -vs- ulogic


Subject: [sv-bc] Re: [sv-ec] logic -vs- ulogic
From: Steven Sharp (sharp@cadence.com)
Date: Mon Apr 14 2003 - 10:12:15 PDT


I agree that the names should be changed to something less likely to cause
conflicts. I am not sure that "ulogic" and "ubit" are the best choices.
The "u" might imply unsigned instead of unresolved, to many people. And if
wires of these types are allowed, they won't necessarily be unresolved.
Multiple drivers could be allowed. The resolution function for "logic" is
obvious, and "bit" could use wire-AND or wire-OR.

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Apr 14 2003 - 10:13:03 PDT