RE: [sv-ec] RE: 0001721: Ballot comment #188 order used for find and find_index

I have no problem with that.

Shalom 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com 
> [mailto:jonathan.bromley@doulos.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 5:46 PM
> To: Bresticker, Shalom; sv-ec@server.eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec] RE: 0001721: Ballot comment #188 order 
> used for find and find_index
> 
> > Defining "first" 
> > and "last" would then enable removing the statement that traversal 
> > order is not defined, as simply being not relevant
> 
> To be picky, I think it *is* relevant if the with-expression
> has side effects.  I'm fine with it being explicitly
> undefined, as that allows implementations to do interesting
> optimizations and (one would hope) discourages the use of
> side effects in the with-expression.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.