> Defining "first" > and "last" would then enable removing the statement that traversal > order is not defined, as simply being not relevant To be picky, I think it *is* relevant if the with-expression has side effects. I'm fine with it being explicitly undefined, as that allows implementations to do interesting optimizations and (one would hope) discourages the use of side effects in the with-expression. -- Jonathan Bromley -- Scanned by iCritical. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Jun 14 07:49:32 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jun 14 2009 - 07:51:10 PDT