RE: [sv-ec] email vote concurrently run for both sv-ec and the champions, ending May 27th

1.  Mantis 2693

    Ballot comment #138: Virtual interface in coverpoint?
    Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___

2.  Mantis 2598

2.1 Ballot comment #52 How can class type parameters be accessed?

    Now handled by Mantis 2575
    Close as a duplicate of 2575
    Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___

2.2 Ballot comment #64 Access to class type parameters

    Now handled by Mantis 2575
    Close as a duplicate of 2575
    Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___

3.  Mantis 2575

3.1 Ballot comment #50 Is this.<param_name> or handle.<param_name> allowed for
    class parameters or local parameters of a class?
    Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___

3.2 Ballot comment #52 How can class type parameters be accessed?
    Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___

3.3 Ballot comment #55 Related to specification of hierarchical class methods
    for triggerring. Is this limited to only static class methods or user can
    specify object specific method as well. What happens if the object is not
    existing?
    Yes ___ No _x__ Abstain ___
This is not addressed by Mantis 2575, and it is unclear as to what the issue is.

3.4 Ballot comment #59 can :: or . be applied to access a class parameter or a
    param declared inside the class?
    Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___

3.5 Ballot comment #64 Access to class type parameters
    Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___

4.  Mantis 2608

    Ballot Comment #59 :: access and dot access to class value parameters and
    local parameters should be allowed

    Now handled by Mantis 2575
    Close as a duplicate of 2575
    Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___

5.  Mantis 2746

    Ballot comment #113 "others" coverage bin example
    Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___

6.  Mantis 2749

    Ballot comment #53 class properties and methods are public
    Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___

7.  Mantis 2750

    Ballot comment #121 "expression" should be "constant_expression"
    Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___

8.  Mantis 2748

    Ballot comment #19 Preponed PLI region not included (but should be removed
    from LRM anyway as it does not really exist)
    No change required.
    See the bug note for an explanation as to why the figure does not need
    to be updated.
    Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___

9.  Mantis 2745

    Ballot comment #111 impicit coverpoint for cross
    An enhancement request
    Move to "Status=Resolved, Resolution=Open" and add the following bug note.

    "The committee read and considered this feedback. the committee believes it
     is too broad for the scope of the draft to implement at this time but may
     be considered for future revisions."
    Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.