[sv-ec] email vote concurrently run for both sv-ec and the champions, ending May 27th

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



This is a call for a joint email vote for both the SV-EC and the Champions. 
Both the SV-EC and the Champions will be voting concurrently.

At the Champion's conference call, held May 21st, we discussed the status 
of the ballot feedback in the SV-EC. Karen requested that I run a joint email
vote for any mantis items that address ballot feedback which are ready for
a vote in the SV-EC. This is that email vote. 

Knowing the outcome of this email vote before the next Working Group meeting to 
be held May 28th, will help the Working Group understand the status. 


   - You have until 5pm PDT, Wednesday, May 27, 2009 to respond
   - An issue passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible
     voters respond with a YES vote.
   - If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied by a reason.

The following members of the SV-EC are eligible to vote: 

   Arturo Salz          
   Cliff Cummings          
   Dave Rich               
   Francoise Martinolle 
   Neil Korpusik         
   Ray Ryan                
   Gordon Vreugdenhil   
   Steven Sharp            
   Stu Sutherland       
   Heath Chambers          
   Don Mills               
   Jonathan Bromley        
   Mark Hartoog            
   Tom Alsop               
   Mike Mintz              
   David Scott           


1.  Mantis 2693   

    Ballot comment #138: Virtual interface in coverpoint?
    Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___

2.  Mantis 2598   

2.1 Ballot comment #52 How can class type parameters be accessed?

    Now handled by Mantis 2575 
    Close as a duplicate of 2575
    Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___

2.2 Ballot comment #64 Access to class type parameters

    Now handled by Mantis 2575 
    Close as a duplicate of 2575
    Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___

3.  Mantis 2575   

3.1 Ballot comment #50 Is this.<param_name> or handle.<param_name> allowed for 
    class parameters or local parameters of a class?
    Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___

3.2 Ballot comment #52 How can class type parameters be accessed?
    Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___

3.3 Ballot comment #55 Related to specification of hierarchical class methods 
    for triggerring. Is this limited to only static class methods or user can 
    specify object specific method as well. What happens if the object is not 
    existing?
    Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___

3.4 Ballot comment #59 can :: or . be applied to access a class parameter or a 
    param declared inside the class?
    Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___

3.5 Ballot comment #64 Access to class type parameters
    Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___

4.  Mantis 2608

    Ballot Comment #59 :: access and dot access to class value parameters and 
    local parameters should be allowed

    Now handled by Mantis 2575 
    Close as a duplicate of 2575
    Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___

5.  Mantis 2746  

    Ballot comment #113 "others" coverage bin example
    Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___

6.  Mantis 2749  

    Ballot comment #53 class properties and methods are public
    Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___

7.  Mantis 2750  

    Ballot comment #121 "expression" should be "constant_expression" 
    Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___

8.  Mantis 2748

    Ballot comment #19 Preponed PLI region not included (but should be removed 
    from LRM anyway as it does not really exist)
    No change required. 
    See the bug note for an explanation as to why the figure does not need
    to be updated. 
    Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___

9.  Mantis 2745 

    Ballot comment #111 impicit coverpoint for cross
    An enhancement request 
    Move to "Status=Resolved, Resolution=Open" and add the following bug note. 

    "The committee read and considered this feedback. the committee believes it
     is too broad for the scope of the draft to implement at this time but may
     be considered for future revisions."
    Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___

Neil