RE: [sv-ec] email vote concurrently run for both sv-ec and the champions, ending May 27th

Neil,

I really think a mistake has been made with ballot id #55. Like Steven Sharp, I have recorded that 55 is "Is a class parameter implicitly "public" and "static"?", and I found that it was so recorded also in the xls that Medhi sent out on April 24. This issue is directly addressed by Mantis 2575. 

I don't know how and when the content of the comment was changed.

Shalom 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Arturo Salz
> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:14 AM
> To: Neil.Korpusik@Sun.com; sv-champions@eda.org; SV_EC List
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec] email vote concurrently run for both 
> sv-ec and the champions, ending May 27th
> 
> 
> 1.  Mantis 2693
> 
>     Ballot comment #138: Virtual interface in coverpoint?
>     Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___
> 
> 2.  Mantis 2598
> 
> 2.1 Ballot comment #52 How can class type parameters be accessed?
> 
>     Now handled by Mantis 2575
>     Close as a duplicate of 2575
>     Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___
> 
> 2.2 Ballot comment #64 Access to class type parameters
> 
>     Now handled by Mantis 2575
>     Close as a duplicate of 2575
>     Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___
> 
> 3.  Mantis 2575
> 
> 3.1 Ballot comment #50 Is this.<param_name> or 
> handle.<param_name> allowed for
>     class parameters or local parameters of a class?
>     Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___
> 
> 3.2 Ballot comment #52 How can class type parameters be accessed?
>     Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___
> 
> 3.3 Ballot comment #55 Related to specification of 
> hierarchical class methods
>     for triggerring. Is this limited to only static class 
> methods or user can
>     specify object specific method as well. What happens if 
> the object is not
>     existing?
>     Yes ___ No _x__ Abstain ___
> This is not addressed by Mantis 2575, and it is unclear as to 
> what the issue is.
> 
> 3.4 Ballot comment #59 can :: or . be applied to access a 
> class parameter or a
>     param declared inside the class?
>     Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___
> 
> 3.5 Ballot comment #64 Access to class type parameters
>     Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___
> 
> 4.  Mantis 2608
> 
>     Ballot Comment #59 :: access and dot access to class 
> value parameters and
>     local parameters should be allowed
> 
>     Now handled by Mantis 2575
>     Close as a duplicate of 2575
>     Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___
> 
> 5.  Mantis 2746
> 
>     Ballot comment #113 "others" coverage bin example
>     Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___
> 
> 6.  Mantis 2749
> 
>     Ballot comment #53 class properties and methods are public
>     Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___
> 
> 7.  Mantis 2750
> 
>     Ballot comment #121 "expression" should be "constant_expression"
>     Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___
> 
> 8.  Mantis 2748
> 
>     Ballot comment #19 Preponed PLI region not included (but 
> should be removed
>     from LRM anyway as it does not really exist)
>     No change required.
>     See the bug note for an explanation as to why the figure 
> does not need
>     to be updated.
>     Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___
> 
> 9.  Mantis 2745
> 
>     Ballot comment #111 impicit coverpoint for cross
>     An enhancement request
>     Move to "Status=Resolved, Resolution=Open" and add the 
> following bug note.
> 
>     "The committee read and considered this feedback. the 
> committee believes it
>      is too broad for the scope of the draft to implement at 
> this time but may
>      be considered for future revisions."
>     Yes _x__ No ___ Abstain ___
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.