Re: [sv-ec] email ballot: response due by 1:00pm PDT Wednesday May 13 2009

Abstain on 2342; yes on the rest.

Reason for abstain on 2342:
    I don't think constructors should be static so I
    am fine with that.  I am a bit concerned that the
    implications of having local or protected constructors
    have not been described further and will abstain
    for that reason.

Gord.



Mehdi Mohtashemi wrote:


>   mantis 2700   proposal 2700-2.pdf for
> 
>    the two following ids.
> 
> id  37  __X__ YES   _____ No
> 
> id  38  __X__ YES   _____ No
> 
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2700   
> 
>  
> 
>   mantis 2575 proposal  err_2575.pdf
> 
>    for the following  ids
> 
> id  50  __X__ YES   _____ No
> 
> id  52  __X__ YES   _____ No
> 
> id  59  __X__ YES   _____ No
> 
> id  64  __X__ YES   _____ No
> 
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2575  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> id 182, svdb 2514    ___X_ YES   _____ No
> 
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2514  
> 
>  
> 
> id 183, svdb 2510    __X__ YES   _____ No
> 
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2510  
> 
>  
> 
> id 185, svdb 2342    _____ YES   _____ No 
> 
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2342  


Abstain

> 
>  
> 
> id 186, svdb 2288    __X__ YES   _____ No
> 
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2288
> 

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Vreugdenhil                                503-685-0808
Model Technology (Mentor Graphics)                gordonv@model.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.