RE: [sv-ec] email ballot: response due by 1:00pm PDT Wednesday May 13 2009

NO to 2575, YES to the remainder.  The problem with 2575 is relatively
small, with respect to using :: with covergroups in classes.
 
-- David
 
 

  mantis 2700   proposal 2700-2.pdf for

   the two following ids.

id  37  __ X __ YES   _____ No

id  38  __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2700   

 

  mantis 2575 proposal  err_2575.pdf 

   for the following  ids

id  50  __ X __ YES   _____ No

id  52  __ X __ YES   _____ No

id  59  _____ YES   __ X __ No

id  64  __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2575  

 

My "no" vote is based upon the proposal to reference covergroups in
Section 8.22 (page 3 of the proposal.)  The embedded covergroup is of
anonymous type (19.4), so :: can't possibly be used here.

 

 

id 182, svdb 2514    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2514  

 

id 183, svdb 2510    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2510  

 

id 185, svdb 2342    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2342  

 

id 186, svdb 2288    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2288

 

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.