RE: [sv-ec] email ballot: response due by 1:00pm PDT Wednesday May 13 2009

From: Steven Sharp <sharp_at_.....>
Date: Thu May 07 2009 - 19:57:12 PDT
>From: Arturo Salz <Arturo.Salz@synopsys.com>

>id 185, svdb 2342    _____ YES   __X__ No
>
>http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2342
>
>
>
>I only object to the limitation that the constructor may not be static -why 
not? And, would there be a semantically observable difference between a static 
versus a non-static constructor? I don't believe there is such a difference. I 
will change my vote to yes if that limitation is removed.


Absolutely there would be an observable difference!  A static method cannot
access any non-static members of the class.  For a constructor, that pretty
much renders it incapable of doing its job.


Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu May 7 19:58:06 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu May 07 2009 - 19:58:57 PDT