Re: [sv-ec] email ballot: response due by 1:00pm PDT Wednesday May 13 2009

From: Gordon Vreugdenhil <gordonv_at_.....>
Date: Thu May 07 2009 - 10:07:51 PDT
Arturo Salz wrote:
> Here are my votes.
> 
>  
> 
>       Arturo
[..]

> 
>   mantis 2575 proposal  err_2575.pdf
> 
>    for the following  ids
> 
> id  50  _____ YES   __X__ No
> 
> id  52  _____ YES   __X__ No
> 
> id  59  _____ YES   __X__ No
> 
> id  64  _____ YES   __X__ No
> 
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2575  
> 
>  
> 
> I would like to normalize access to all parameters via the class 
> resolution operator only. If pushed, I would agree to allow 
> this.value_parameter only because the unadorned form is also allowed.



I would object to a proposal that makes such a restriction.  I don't
think the restriction is consistent with other uses of dotted
forms in virtual interface contexts and other contexts.

Gord




> I agree with the intent of Id-64 (use the class resolution operator to 
> access type parameters) but the current proposal should be merged with 
> the proposal of Mantis 2575, to includes the extra verbiage and the 
> examples – possibly a type parameter example.




-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Vreugdenhil                                503-685-0808
Model Technology (Mentor Graphics)                gordonv@model.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu May 7 10:08:27 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu May 07 2009 - 10:09:31 PDT