> 175 - id 105 > David S. - not sure why nets and wires need to be mentioned. > Dave - passing by ref might be the issue. > Francoise - we can't do coverage of wires, it appears > Steven - a wire is an expression. > Stu - the wording could cause problems. > Dave - see Mantis 1575 > > AI: David Scott - row 175, id 105, follow-up, non-trivial > >[SC] I had filed this earlier in mantis 1575 as a logical enhancement. >Is there any specific reason for not including this? The values in >nets/wires >[SC] may be integral which users may want to sample directly by writing >coverpoints for them. Swapnajit, My point was that the text allows expressions. A net is a valid expression. So it appears to me that the text already allows nets. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Apr 16 10:17:16 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 16 2009 - 10:17:58 PDT