RE: [sv-ec] Request to review ballot issues, Meeting Minutes April 13, 2009, Action Items

From: Steven Sharp <sharp_at_.....>
Date: Thu Apr 16 2009 - 10:16:18 PDT
>   175       - id 105
>   David S.  - not sure why nets and wires need to be mentioned.
>   Dave      - passing by ref might be the issue. 
>   Francoise - we can't do coverage of wires, it appears 
>   Steven    - a wire is an expression.
>   Stu       - the wording could cause problems.  
>   Dave      - see Mantis 1575 
>
>  AI: David Scott - row 175, id 105, follow-up, non-trivial 
> 
>[SC] I had filed this earlier in mantis 1575 as a logical enhancement.
>Is there any specific reason for not including this? The values in
>nets/wires
>[SC] may be integral which users may want to sample directly by writing
>coverpoints for them.

Swapnajit,

My point was that the text allows expressions.  A net is a valid expression.
So it appears to me that the text already allows nets.


Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Apr 16 10:17:16 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 16 2009 - 10:17:58 PDT