RE: [sv-ec] Request to review ballot issues, Meeting Minutes April 13, 2009, Action Items

Hi Steve,

I completely agree with you. In that case shouldn't we match these two
sentences?

Section 19.3
"A coverage point can cover a variable or an expression."

Section 19.5
"A coverage point specifies an integral expression that is to be
covered."

I believe the second is the generic one.

Regs,
Swapnajit 

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Sharp [mailto:sharp@cadence.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 10:46 PM
To: Mehdi.Mohtashemi@synopsys.com; sv-ec@eda.org; Swapnajit Chakraborti
Cc: Francoise Martinolle; Swapnajit Chakraborti
Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Request to review ballot issues, Meeting Minutes
April 13, 2009, Action Items


>   175       - id 105
>   David S.  - not sure why nets and wires need to be mentioned.
>   Dave      - passing by ref might be the issue. 
>   Francoise - we can't do coverage of wires, it appears 
>   Steven    - a wire is an expression.
>   Stu       - the wording could cause problems.  
>   Dave      - see Mantis 1575 
>
>  AI: David Scott - row 175, id 105, follow-up, non-trivial
> 
>[SC] I had filed this earlier in mantis 1575 as a logical enhancement.
>Is there any specific reason for not including this? The values in 
>nets/wires [SC] may be integral which users may want to sample directly

>by writing coverpoints for them.

Swapnajit,

My point was that the text allows expressions.  A net is a valid
expression.
So it appears to me that the text already allows nets.


Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.