Stu, > 1) The proposal needs to show that the existing production in > Syntax 17-9 is being deleted. (It is being deleted, right?) The proposal already says, "REPLACE contents of syntax box 17-9 (in clause 17.7) WITH the following text, and update the caption appropriately" > 2) The BNF changes to Syntax 17-9 for randomize_call needs to > include the footnote being added to the same production in Annex A. That footnote says, "In a randomize_call that is not a method call of an object of class type...". Syntax 17-9 *IS* about a method call of an object of class type and so the footnote is not relevant there, and might even be confusing. It's a judgement call as to whether to add it or not. > 3) The title to Syntax 17-9 be changed from "... (note in > Annex A)" to "...(excerpt from Annex A). This is another judgement call, since only half of the Syntax is from Annex A. > 4) The BNF changes to the subroutine_call production also > need to be made in Syntax 13-3. Yes, I agree. Thanks, Shalom --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Apr 21 13:06:23 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 21 2008 - 13:06:53 PDT