> > 2279 ___ Yes _X_ No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2279 > I will change my vote to yes if the following friendly amendments are made to the proposal: 1) The proposal needs to show that the existing production in Syntax 17-9 is being deleted. (It is being deleted, right?) 2) The BNF changes to Syntax 17-9 for randomize_call needs to include the footnote being added to the same production in Annex A. 3) The title to Syntax 17-9 be changed from "... (note in Annex A)" to "...(excerpt from Annex A). 4) The BNF changes to the subroutine_call production also need to be made in Syntax 13-3. Stu ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Stuart Sutherland stuart@sutherland-hdl.com +1-503-692-0898 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Apr 21 12:19:44 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 21 2008 - 12:19:54 PDT