Stu, > I will change my vote to yes if the following friendly > amendments are made to the proposal: > > 1) The proposal needs to show that the existing production in > Syntax 17-9 is > being deleted. (It is being deleted, right?) See Shalom's comment - I think this is already covered. > 2) The BNF changes to Syntax 17-9 for randomize_call needs to > include the > footnote being added to the same production in Annex A. Likewise, I agree with Shalom here - 17-9 describes a specific usage of the more general syntax, and in that specific usage the Note is irrelevant. > 3) The title to Syntax 17-9 be changed from "... (note in Annex A)" to > "...(excerpt from Annex A). I'm sorry, I ducked out of that one by noting "and change caption accordingly" - leaving it to your judgement. In fact I think it would be best simply to delete mention of Annex A in the caption, since the relationship is explicit in comments in the (new) body of the syntax box. So I'd suggest the caption be changed to simply Syntax 17-9 - Inline constraint syntax > 4) The BNF changes to the subroutine_call production also > need to be made in Syntax 13-3. Agreed; sorry, I completely missed that. New proposal 3a uploaded to implement this, and make the new caption for Syntax 17-9 explicit. Are the changes small enough that people's votes can stand? Thanks -- Jonathan Bromley, Consultant DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 1AW, UK Tel: +44 (0)1425 471223 Email: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573 Web: http://www.doulos.com The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Apr 21 15:56:26 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 21 2008 - 15:57:03 PDT