RE: [sv-ec]e-mail Ballot: Closes 11:59pm PDT, Tuesday April 22 2008

From: Jonathan Bromley <jonathan.bromley_at_.....>
Date: Mon Apr 21 2008 - 15:55:37 PDT
Stu,

> I will change my vote to yes if the following friendly 
> amendments are made to the proposal:
> 
> 1) The proposal needs to show that the existing production in 
> Syntax 17-9 is
> being deleted.  (It is being deleted, right?)

See Shalom's comment - I think this is already covered.
 
> 2) The BNF changes to Syntax 17-9 for randomize_call needs to 
> include the
> footnote being added to the same production in Annex A.

Likewise, I agree with Shalom here - 17-9 describes a specific
usage of the more general syntax, and in that specific usage
the Note is irrelevant.

> 3) The title to Syntax 17-9 be changed from "... (note in Annex A)" to
> "...(excerpt from Annex A).

I'm sorry, I ducked out of that one by noting "and change caption
accordingly" - leaving it to your judgement.  In fact I think it would
be best simply to delete mention of Annex A in the caption, since the 
relationship is explicit in comments in the (new) body of the syntax box.
So I'd suggest the caption be changed to simply
  Syntax 17-9 - Inline constraint syntax

> 4) The BNF changes to the subroutine_call production also 
> need to be made in Syntax 13-3. 

Agreed; sorry, I completely missed that.  New proposal 3a 
uploaded to implement this, and make the new caption 
for Syntax 17-9 explicit.  Are the changes small enough
that people's votes can stand?

Thanks
-- 
Jonathan Bromley, Consultant

DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how
VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services

Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 1AW, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1425 471223                   Email: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com
Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573                           Web: http://www.doulos.com

The contents of this message may contain personal views which 
are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Apr 21 15:56:26 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 21 2008 - 15:57:03 PDT