Re: [sv-ec] Updated Mantis 1447

Hi Jonathan,

Sure - let me know what changes you'd like to make and I can incorporate 
them into 1447. Assuming there are no land mines, of course :) I need to 
make another pass anyways to incorporate Shalom's feedback.

--Mike

Jonathan Bromley wrote:
> Michael,
>
> Shalom pointed out this Mantis shortly after I'd written-up
> 1702, which covers some of the same territory.
>
> The bulk of 1702 affects clause 10 and is independent of 1447.
> However, I found I needed some fixes to clause 7 that interact
> with your proposal.
>
> Would you be open to an adjustment of 1447 that would clarify
> assignment-compatibility amongst all kinds of unpacked array
> except associative (i.e. dynamic, queue and fixed-size)?  
> If so, I could restrict the scope of 1702 to affect only clause 10.
>
> I'm fairly sure that it would be a rather small change to 
> what you've already done, and it would have the advantage
> of keeping the two proposals independent.
>
> Alternatively I could rewrite 1702 working on the assumption
> that 1447 is already implemented.
>
> thanks
>   


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.