Michael, Shalom pointed out this Mantis shortly after I'd written-up 1702, which covers some of the same territory. The bulk of 1702 affects clause 10 and is independent of 1447. However, I found I needed some fixes to clause 7 that interact with your proposal. Would you be open to an adjustment of 1447 that would clarify assignment-compatibility amongst all kinds of unpacked array except associative (i.e. dynamic, queue and fixed-size)? If so, I could restrict the scope of 1702 to affect only clause 10. I'm fairly sure that it would be a rather small change to what you've already done, and it would have the advantage of keeping the two proposals independent. Alternatively I could rewrite 1702 working on the assumption that 1447 is already implemented. thanks -- Jonathan Bromley, Consultant DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 1AW, UK Tel: +44 (0)1425 471223 Email: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573 Web: http://www.doulos.com The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Nov 19 13:01:09 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 19 2007 - 13:01:43 PST