Mike, > > Would you be open to an adjustment of 1447 that would clarify > > assignment-compatibility amongst all kinds of unpacked array > > except associative (i.e. dynamic, queue and fixed-size)? > > If so, I could restrict the scope of 1702 to affect only clause 10. > Sure - let me know what changes you'd like to make and I can > incorporate them into 1447. Assuming there are no land mines, > of course :) > I need to make another pass anyways to incorporate > Shalom's feedback. I've split my 1702 proposal so as to decouple it from your 1447. I'd tried to make a few changes to clause 7 to do much the same as 1447 does, but I was much less thorough about it than you have been. However, your 1447 proposal doesn't say much about queues, and I think there is a consensus that your treatment of dynamic dimensions of an array is pretty much applicable to queues also (except, of course, that new[] doesn't apply to queues). Here's a document (both PDF and MS Word) containing the 1447-ish changes that I've now removed from 1702. My guess is that you'll decide you have dealt with almost all of it already, except that you'll need to say "and queues" in a few places.... Please shout if there's anything you need me to do about this. Thanks and regards -- Jonathan Bromley, Consultant DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 1AW, UK Tel: +44 (0)1425 471223 Email: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573 Web: http://www.doulos.com The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 27 2007 - 13:50:56 PST