RE: [sv-ec]E-mail Vote: Closes 12am PST October 10th 2007 - 1336

From: Rich, Dave <Dave_Rich_at_.....>
Date: Wed Oct 10 2007 - 21:34:30 PDT
Cliff, 
Correct example with constructor, although the example isn't complete
enough to do anything useful anyways. (This was Arturo's example from
1615 and has been passed by this committee three times already).

The final block only permits statements that are legal in functions. And
functions that are called from final blocks are not allowed NBAs or
fork/join_none statements because a final block is not an initial or
always procedure.

Dave





> 1336  No
> I think there are problems with the example (no constructor). The
> final block claims that any statement that is legal in a function is
> legal in an always block. This now permits nonblocking assignments to
> be used in a final block, which I am not sure is a good idea in a
final
> block.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Oct 10 21:34:52 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 10 2007 - 21:35:01 PDT