Re: [sv-ec]E-mail Vote: Closes 12am PST October 10th 2007

From: Clifford E. Cummings <cliffc_at_.....>
Date: Mon Oct 08 2007 - 16:42:24 PDT
Cliff's EC Votes

339  Yes

1336  No
I think there are problems with the example (no constructor). The 
final block claims that any statement that is legal in a function is 
legal in an always block. This now permits nonblocking assignments to 
be used in a final block, which I am not sure is a good idea in a final block.

1384  Yes

1560  Yes

1594  Yes

1608  Yes

1615  Yes

1679  Yes

1715  Yes

1871  Yes

1897  Abstain
(This is a rather complex enhancement to be passed by an email vote)

1928  Yes

2007  Yes

Regards - Cliff

----------------------------------------------------
Cliff Cummings - Sunburst Design, Inc.
14314 SW Allen Blvd., PMB 501, Beaverton, OR 97005
Phone: 503-641-8446 / FAX: 503-641-8486
cliffc@sunburst-design.com / www.sunburst-design.com
Expert Verilog, SystemVerilog, Synthesis and Verification Training


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Oct 8 16:43:21 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 08 2007 - 16:43:59 PDT