Gordon Vreugdenhil wrote: [...] > I'll follow-up to this a bit later today with a Mantis > item and proposal to address what I think is the more > consistent and correct way in which to read the intent > of the LRM in this area. I have filed Mantis 2087 on this issue and attached a proposal. Mehdi, given the potential for substantial impact on the overall LRM if this proposal does not express the intent of the committee, could we address this at the next EC meeting? Gord. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Oct 8 15:12:59 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 08 2007 - 15:13:26 PDT