New proposal uploaded contains friendly amendments from Neil, Cliff. I did not take Mike Burns suggestion as I didn't think it was correct. A process is allowed to block, even if it calls a function. If a process makes a call, the process can return from that call. Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On > Behalf Of Neil Korpusik > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 6:59 PM > To: Mehdi Mohtashemi > Cc: sv-ec@server.eda.org > Subject: Re: [sv-ec]E-mail Vote: Closes 12am PST October 10th 2007 > > My votes are below. > > Neil > > > > > 339 yes > 1336 no > > I will change my vote to yes if the following changes are made. > > 1. There appears to be something wrong with the sentence added to 9.3.2 > > From: > Use restricted inside function calls (See 13.4) Functions > To: > Has restricted usage inside function calls (See 13.4). > > 2. Section 13.4.4 > > Brad offered the following suggestion. This would make this change > consistent with the line immediately above it. > > From: > A constant function shall not have any fork constructs. > To: > A constant function shall not contain any fork constructs. > > 3. Section 13.4.5 > > From: > From within a function, a fork-join_none construct may contain > any > statements that are legal from within a task. > To: > Within a function, a fork-join_none construct may contain any > statements that are legal within a task. > > 1384 yes > 1560 no > > I will change my vote to yes if this one change is removed from the > proposal. > > Why change the word prototype to syntax? > All of the Queue methods described in 7.11.2 mention the word > prototype. > Why is it being changed to syntax for just the delete method? > > 1594 yes, with the following friendly ammendments > > Two minor word-smithing problems: > 1) operand --> operands > 2) wild card --> wildcard > > From: > The logical equality (or case equality) operator is a legal > operation if > either operand is a class object or the literal null and one of the > operand is... > To: > The logical equality (or case equality) operator is a legal > operation if > either operand is a class object or the literal null and one of the > operands is... > > From: > wild card > To: > wildcard > > 1608 no > > section 8.4 > > There is something wrong with this sentence > > "Assignment of a class object which class datatype is assignment > compatible with the target class object" > > Something like the following seems more correct: > Assignment of a class object which is datatype assignment > compatible > with the target class object > > 1615 yes - agree to close (covered by 1336) > 1679 yes > 1715 yes > > Minor correction: > I think that the reference to clause 15 should actually be to 15.5. > > 1871 yes > 1897 yes > 1928 yes > > If none of John's comments are incorporated into 1928 we should open > a > new mantis item to address John's feedback. > > 2007 yes > > > > > Mehdi Mohtashemi wrote On 10/02/07 08:17 PM,: > > Hi, > > Based on October 1 2007 sv-ec meeting, we are conducting > > an email vote on the following mantis items: > > > > 339 1336 1384 1560 1594 1608 1615 1679 1715 1871 1897 1928 > > 2007 > > > > Operating guidelines for sv-ec email vote: > > - Only one (1) week to respond (Midnight October 10 2007) > > - An issue passes if there are zero ** NO ** votes and at least > > half of the eligible voters respond with a YES vote. > > - Any NO vote must be accompanied by a reason. > > This issue will then be up for discussion at the next conference call. > > - Please indicate any friendly amendment that you think will change > > your vote to a YES, this will help with completing our task. > > > > - Notes: > > * 1615: the vote for mantis item 1615 is to close it, covered by 1336. > > * 1928: re-approve. If needed sv-ec can open another mantis item > > > > As of the October 1 2007 meeting, the eligible voters are (total 15): > > > > Arturo Salz, > > Cliff Cummings > > Dave Rich > > Francoise Martinolle > > Gordon Vreugdenhil > > Neil Korpusik > > Ray Ryan > > Steven Sharp > > Stu Sutherland > > Heath Chambers > > Don Mills > > Mark Hartoog > > Geoffrey Coram > > David Scott > > Mike Burns > > > > > > Please mark your vote below by an x. If No, then specify a reason. > > Send it to the reflector. > > > > 339 ___ Yes ___ No > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=000339 > > > > 1336 ___ Yes ___ No > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001336 > > > > 1384 ___ Yes ___ No > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001384 > > > > 1560 ___ Yes ___ No > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001560 > > > > 1594 ___ Yes ___ No > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001594 > > > > 1608 ___ Yes ___ No > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001608 > > > > 1615 ___ Yes ___ No CLOSE 1615, covered by 1336 > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001615 > > > > 1679 ___ Yes ___ No > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001679 > > > > 1715 ___ Yes ___ No > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001715 > > > > 1871 ___ Yes ___ No > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001871 > > > > 1897 ___ Yes ___ No > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001897 > > > > 1928 ___ Yes ___ No Re-approve. If needed open other mantis > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001928 > > > > 2007 ___ Yes ___ No > > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002007 > > > > > > > > 339 typos in queue methods > > 1336 Rules for allowed statements in a function > > 1384 bit stream cast and pack/unpack for protected./local members > > 1560 Queue delete() method for entire array > > 1594 conditional operator for class handles incorrect > > 1608 equality, inequality and conditional operator rules for class > > handles > > 1615 can processes spawned by functions execute blocking statements? > > 1679 string casting statement unclear > > 1715 Triggered property of a clocking block > > 1871 clarification needed for illegal/ignore transition bins > > 1897 clarify "union of all significant bins" and "overlapping bins" in > > coverage computation > > 1928 clarification of coverpoint value resolution (18.5.6) > > 2007 7.9.4: rules about int type index for associative arrays > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Neil Korpusik Tel: 408-276-6385 > Frontend Technologies (FTAP) Fax: 408-276-5092 > Sun Microsystems email: neil.korpusik@sun.com > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Oct 10 21:19:08 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 10 2007 - 21:19:44 PDT