Re: [sv-ec] Alternate Class Proposal Version 1.1

Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Alternate Class Proposal Version 1.1
From: Arturo Salz (Arturo.Salz@synopsys.com)
Date: Fri Mar 14 2003 - 04:38:03 PST

• Next message: Jay Lawrence: "[sv-ec] Non-blocking Event Trigger"
• Previous message: Mehdi Mohtashemi: "RE: [sv-ec] event variables"
• Maybe in reply to: Jay Lawrence: "[sv-ec] Alternate Class Proposal Version 1.1"
• Next in thread: Kevin Cameron: "Re: [sv-ec] Alternate Class Proposal Version 1.1"
• Next in thread: Jay Lawrence: "RE: [sv-ec] Alternate Class Proposal Version 1.1"
• Maybe reply: Arturo Salz: "Re: [sv-ec] Alternate Class Proposal Version 1.1"
• Reply: Kevin Cameron: "Re: [sv-ec] Alternate Class Proposal Version 1.1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Attached is an analysis and critique of the alternate class proposal.

Contrary to Jay's comments, the alternate proposal does create
explicit and arbitrary unsafe pointers. This, I'm sure, was not an
attempt to mislead but an honest oversight.

    Arturo

• application/pdf attachment: static-class.pdf

• Next message: Jay Lawrence: "[sv-ec] Non-blocking Event Trigger"
• Previous message: Mehdi Mohtashemi: "RE: [sv-ec] event variables"
• Maybe in reply to: Jay Lawrence: "[sv-ec] Alternate Class Proposal Version 1.1"
• Next in thread: Kevin Cameron: "Re: [sv-ec] Alternate Class Proposal Version 1.1"
• Next in thread: Jay Lawrence: "RE: [sv-ec] Alternate Class Proposal Version 1.1"
• Maybe reply: Arturo Salz: "Re: [sv-ec] Alternate Class Proposal Version 1.1"
• Reply: Kevin Cameron: "Re: [sv-ec] Alternate Class Proposal Version 1.1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Mar 14 2003 - 04:42:19 PST