Re: [sv-bc] section 4.2 enum_base_type production

From: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce_at_.....>
Date: Wed Nov 29 2006 - 09:59:35 PST
As described in the attachment of

   http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-bc/hm/5388.html

by approx. Jan. 15, 2007 there should be unofficial versions of the LRMs
available to P1800 members that incorporate all of the corrections
recommended by P1800 as of Nov. 9, 2006.

All of these corrections are unofficial because they are still subject
to balloting near the end of 2007.

-- Brad

________________________________

From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Francoise Martinolle
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 8:31 AM
To: sv-bc@eda-stds.org
Subject: [sv-bc] section 4.2 enum_base_type production


Didn't we decide recently that the type_identifier in 
type_identifier {packed_dimension} in section 4.2 could refer to a
integer_vector_type or any typedef of an integer_vector_type?
 
Is the following legal?
 
typede logic mylogic;
 
enum mylogic [1:3] {in, out} enum_t;
 
I wish we had an LRM which contains all the errata that we agreed on...
 
Francoise
       '
Received on Wed Nov 29 09:59:38 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 29 2006 - 09:59:55 PST