Re: [sv-bc] wrong footnote for section 4.2

From: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce_at_.....>
Date: Wed Nov 29 2006 - 10:28:04 PST
Yes, in both Syntax 4-1 and Syntax 4-3.  Also, these footnotes should be
hyperlinked.
 
And in Syntax 4-1, the footnote in variable_decl_assignment should be 15
instead of 16, and should be hyperlinked.
 
-- Brad

________________________________

From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Francoise Martinolle
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 8:10 AM
To: sv-bc@eda-stds.org
Subject: [sv-bc] wrong footnote for section 4.2


The footnote 24 in the syntax box of section 4.2, enum_base_type
production is wrong.
It should be 23 and not 24.
 
Received on Wed Nov 29 10:28:10 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 29 2006 - 10:28:19 PST