RE: [sv-bc] RE: [sv-ec] Question: logic & reg - what is the difference?


Subject: RE: [sv-bc] RE: [sv-ec] Question: logic & reg - what is the difference?
From: Stuart Sutherland (stuart@sutherland-hdl.com)
Date: Mon Jun 09 2003 - 08:16:58 PDT


Jay,

I hate to show off my ignorance, but for the sake of a Verilog user, and
not one who writes tools or parsers, can you explain the difference between
"reg as an object declaration" and "logic as a type"? How does the
difference affect tools, the PLI, and most importantly the user writing
SystemVerilog code?

Stu

At 12:48 PM 6/5/2003, Jay Lawrence wrote:

>We did resolve that the new rules for continuous assignments being
>allowed to variables applied to ALL variables. This simplification made
>logic and reg identical. We even had a straw vote on eliminating logic
>because it was now redundant. We then paused in our rush to judgement
>because logic can be declared inside other things (like a struct) and
>maybe we wanted to use 'logic' as purely a name for a type and leave
>'reg' as the declaration of an object.
>
>Jay
>
>P.s. The "data type donation" to IEEE does exactly this. It leaves reg
>as an object declaration and logic as a type.
>
>===================================
>Jay Lawrence
>Senior Architect
>Functional Verification
>Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
>(978) 262-6294
>lawrence@cadence.com
>===================================
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Clifford E. Cummings [mailto:cliffc@sunburst-design.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 6:49 AM
> > To: sv-ec@eda.org; sv-bc@eda.org
> > Subject: [sv-bc] RE: [sv-ec] Question: logic & reg - what is
> > the difference?
> >
> >
> > At 07:02 PM 6/4/03 -0700, Andy Tsay wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >It seems the only difference is:
> > >a logic object can be used for both continuous and
> > >procedural assignment, but a reg object can only be in
> > >a procedural assignment.
> > >
> > >A logic object can be used as output of a gate, but a
> > >reg object cannot.
> >
> > This is what I thought too, but this is not what it says in
> > section 5.6.
> >
> >
> > >-- Andy
> > >
> > >
> > >--- "David W. Smith" <david.smith@synopsys.com> wrote:
> > > > Cliff,
> > > >
> > > > I seem to remember the meeting, and the vote, where
> > > > it was decided that
> > > > logic and reg where the same thing. I think you were
> > > > there. It appears that
> > > > some text in the LRM may not have been caught when
> > > > BC made the change.
> > > >
> > > > Since this was all done in the BC I will forward it
> > > > to BC for comment.
> >
> > Thanks, David. I was at the face-to-face meeting in San Jose and a
> > follow-on phone meeting when we discussed logic and some
> > potential behavior
> > surrounding regs but I did not remember this change. I was
> > wondering if the
> > EC had "enhanced" the definition of regs. It is beginning to
> > look like a
> > significant bug in the spec (especially if ModelTech is
> > reading what I am
> > reading and attempting to implement the bug).
> >
> > Regards - Cliff
> >
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > David
> > > >
> > > > David W. Smith
> > > > Synopsys Scientist
> > > >
> > > > Synopsys, Inc.
> > > > Synopsys Technology Park
> > > > 2025 NW Cornelius Pass Road
> > > > Hillsboro, OR 97124
> > > >
> > > > Voice: 503.547.6467
> > > > Main: 503.547.6000
> > > > FAX: 503.547.6906
> > > > Email: david.smith@synopsys.com
> > > > http://www.synopsys.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org
> > > > [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of Clifford
> > > > E. Cummings
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:37 PM
> > > > To: sv-ec@eda.org
> > > > Subject: [sv-ec] Question: logic & reg - what is the
> > > > difference?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi, all -
> > > >
> > > > I was talking to the ModelSim developers and we ran
> > > > into this question:
> > > >
> > > > Are logic and reg the same thing? Did I miss this
> > > > proposal and vote?
> > > >
> > > > According to table 3.1, logic has "different use
> > > > rules from reg."
> > > >
> > > > Section 5.6 - 3rd paragraph
> > > >
> > > > In SystemVerilog, all variables (including reg?) can
> > > > now be written either
> > > > by one continuous assignment, or by one or more
> > > > procedural statements,
> > > > including procedural continuous assignments. It
> > > > shall be an error to have
> > > > multiple continuous assignments or a mixture of
> > > > procedural and continuous
> > > > assignments writing to the same variable. All data
> > > > types can write through
> > > > a port.
> > > >
> > > > So now what is the difference between a logic and a
> > > > reg?
> > > >
> > > > Is logic 100% redundant with reg? Both must be
> > > > declared.
> > > >
> > > > Regards - Cliff
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------
> > > > Cliff Cummings - Sunburst Design, Inc.
> > > > 14314 SW Allen Blvd., PMB 501, Beaverton, OR 97005
> > > > Phone: 503-641-8446 / FAX: 503-641-8486
> > > > cliffc@sunburst-design.com /
> > > > www.sunburst-design.com Expert Verilog, Synthesis
> > > > and Verification Training
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > Cliff Cummings - Sunburst Design, Inc.
> > 14314 SW Allen Blvd., PMB 501, Beaverton, OR 97005
> > Phone: 503-641-8446 / FAX: 503-641-8486
> > cliffc@sunburst-design.com / www.sunburst-design.com
> > Expert Verilog, Synthesis and Verification Training
> >
> >
> >

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stuart Sutherland Sutherland HDL Inc.
stuart@sutherland-hdl.com 22805 SW 92nd Place
phone: 503-692-0898 Tualatin, OR 97062
www.sutherland-hdl.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Jun 09 2003 - 08:21:41 PDT