No, procedural assignments to nets (including a nettype) are not legal.
The example is
not legal and should be fixed.
Gord.
On 1/31/2012 1:38 PM, Stuart Sutherland wrote:
>
> Clause 6.6.8 of P1800-2012 Draft 4 (added in draft 3 by Mantis 3724)
> has an example of defining a new nettype:
>
> nettype real realNet;
>
> And then doing procedural assignments to that net. This is in the
> first driver module in the second example of 6.6.8.
>
> Is it now legal to make procedural assignments to nets? If so, what
> Mantis item added that feature?
>
> Stu
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Stuart Sutherland
>
> Sutherland HDL, Inc.
>
> stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
>
> 503-692-0898
> www.sutherland-hdl.com <http://www.sutherland-hdl.com>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jan 31 13:54:02 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 31 2012 - 13:54:04 PST