Re: [sv-ec] clarifications on mantis 2606 vote

From: Gordon Vreugdenhil <gordonv_at_.....>
Date: Wed Jun 17 2009 - 07:02:29 PDT
Mehdi, could you please state the clarification here.

I don't understand how a vote with 5 in favor, 3 opposed,
and 1 abstain could fail.

If Jamie's vote was not counted (as a proxy) then there
were still 4 in favor and only 3 opposed.  Also, if that
is the case, I am going to contest the result as I had
asked you about a proxy and you said it was Ok.  I would
have called in for that vote had a proxy not been Ok.

Gord.


Mehdi Mohtashemi wrote:
> As per action item during sv-ec meeting on June 15 2009, I clarified the 
> voting
> 
> procedures per IEEE sv-ec operating procedures with Karen Pieper.  The 
> mantis
> 
> item 2606 *fails to pass* based on the guidelines.   
> 
> Here is the information on the vote, from meeting minute [to be 
> published to
> 
> the sv-ec site later this week]:
> 
>  
> 
> On Mantis 2606, id 62, there was a vote taken with the following results:
> 
>           Move: Francoise  to approve mantis 2606  proposal 
>  2606_proto_refs[2].pdf
>       Second: Steven
>     Abstain: Jonathan [outside of core competency]
>     Opposed: Mark, Arturo,
>              [outside of scope this ballot raised,
>               we would vote yes if the second sentence was re-phrased to 
>  type declaration]
>           Steven: It reduces consensus, even though it is a better way 
> to go.
>                              I am in favor of proposal but concerned it 
> would trigger negative ballot.
>     Total:
>                    YES:  Dave, Ray, Jamie, Don, Francoise 
>                     NO:   Mark, Arturo, Steven,
>          ABSTAIN:  Jonathan   
> 
> Note that based on this vote and the one in the previous sv-ec meetings, 
> the procedure
> 
> and policy guidelines will be updated to be more clear.
> 
>  
> 
> - Mehdi
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Vreugdenhil                                503-685-0808
Model Technology (Mentor Graphics)                gordonv@model.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Jun 17 07:04:02 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jun 17 2009 - 07:04:52 PDT