As per action item during sv-ec meeting on June 15 2009, I clarified the voting procedures per IEEE sv-ec operating procedures with Karen Pieper. The mantis item 2606 fails to pass based on the guidelines. Here is the information on the vote, from meeting minute [to be published to the sv-ec site later this week]: On Mantis 2606, id 62, there was a vote taken with the following results: Move: Francoise to approve mantis 2606 proposal 2606_proto_refs[2].pdf Second: Steven Abstain: Jonathan [outside of core competency] Opposed: Mark, Arturo, [outside of scope this ballot raised, we would vote yes if the second sentence was re-phrased to type declaration] Steven: It reduces consensus, even though it is a better way to go. I am in favor of proposal but concerned it would trigger negative ballot. Total: YES: Dave, Ray, Jamie, Don, Francoise NO: Mark, Arturo, Steven, ABSTAIN: Jonathan Note that based on this vote and the one in the previous sv-ec meetings, the procedure and policy guidelines will be updated to be more clear. - Mehdi -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jun 16 16:49:06 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 16 2009 - 16:49:57 PDT