[sv-ec] RE: 0001721: Ballot comment #188 order used for find and find_index

So if I propose an ordering, should the original ordering of
unique/_index be preserved as well?

 

________________________________

From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 7:55 PM
To: Rich, Dave; sv-ec@server.eda.org
Subject: RE: 0001721: Ballot comment #188 order used for find and
find_index

 

The text already says that the order is unspecified.

From the comment in the description, "(e.g. traversal is left to right
of the bounds, associative is min to max)", it appears to me that the
desire was to specify an order.

 

Shalom

	 

	
________________________________


	From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org
[mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Rich, Dave
	Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 3:23 AM
	To: sv-ec@server.eda.org
	Subject: [sv-ec] 0001721: Ballot comment #188 order used for
find and find_index

	In reviewing this mantis item, I can't remember the intent of
the change being requested. 

	 

	Section 7.13.1 says  "Array locator methods traverse the array
in an unspecified order." and that make sense for all methods other than
find_first/_index and find_last/_index. Those methods seem like they
should have an order

	 

	Was there some desire to specify an order for find/_index, or to
specify that the result ordering is unrelated to the original array
(like unique/_index)?

	
	-- 
	This message has been scanned for viruses and 
	dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>
, and is 
	believed to be clean. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.