[sv-ec] RE: 0001721: Ballot comment #188 order used for find and find_index

The text already says that the order is unspecified.
From the comment in the description, "(e.g. traversal is left to right of the bounds, associative is min to max)", it appears to me that the desire was to specify an order.

Shalom

________________________________
From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Rich, Dave
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 3:23 AM
To: sv-ec@server.eda.org
Subject: [sv-ec] 0001721: Ballot comment #188 order used for find and find_index

In reviewing this mantis item, I can't remember the intent of the change being requested.

Section 7.13.1 says  "Array locator methods traverse the array in an unspecified order." and that make sense for all methods other than find_first/_index and find_last/_index. Those methods seem like they should have an order

Was there some desire to specify an order for find/_index, or to specify that the result ordering is unrelated to the original array (like unique/_index)?

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.