RE: [sv-ec] email ballot: response due by 11:59pm Thursday June 11 2009

Mantis 2380   ids  33, 34, 56

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2380

   __X___ YES   _____ No



I find the verbiage redefining element somewhat confusing. I would propose the following friendly amendment.

From:

* the element types of source and target shall be equivalent;


* if the target is a fixed-size array or a slice, the source array shall have the same number of elements as the target.
Here element refers to elements of the slowest-varying array dimension. These elements may themselves be of some
unpacked array type. Consequently, for two arrays to be assignment compatible it is necessary (but not sufficient) that they

have the same number of unpacked dimensions.



To:
* the type of the elements of the slowest-varying dimension of source and target shall be equivalent

* the source and target shall have the same number of unpacked dimensions


* if the target is a fixed-size array or a slice, all dimensions of the source array shall have the same length as the target.
The slowest-varying dimension may itself  be an unpacked array. Consequently, for two arrays to be assignment compatible it is necessary (but not sufficient) that they

have the same number of unpacked dimensions.





Mantis 1517    id 189

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1517

   _____ YES   __X___ No



Waiting for the new version.



Mantis 2715    id 21

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2715

   __X___ YES   _____ No



--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous
content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.