[sv-ec] RE: mantis 2380 comment

From: Arturo Salz <Arturo.Salz_at_.....>
Date: Tue Jun 09 2009 - 17:43:55 PDT
Shalom,

Indeed. The proposal hinges on the fact that unpacked array concatenation already stipulates assignment compatibility. Jonathan's proposal is an opportunistic clarification using the existing semantics.

            Arturo

From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:15 PM
To: Francoise Martinolle; sv-ec@server.eda.org
Subject: [sv-ec] RE: mantis 2380 comment

If I understood correctly, one of the points of the proposal is that unpacked array concatenations (10.10) will only require assignment compatibility, as opposed to an array assignment.

Shalom

________________________________
From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Francoise Martinolle
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 10:06 PM
To: sv-ec@server.eda.org
Subject: [sv-ec] mantis 2380 comment
Jonathan,

in your second proposal:


MODIFY the second bullet point of clause 10.10 as follows (insert word "unpacked"):

- an item whose self-determined type is an unpacked array whose slowest-varying dimension's element type is assignment

compatible with the element type of the target array shall represent as many elements as exist in that item, arranged in the

same left-to-right order as they would appear in the array item itself;



Should n't it be :

whose slowest-varying dimension's element type is assignment comaptible (if array type) or equivalent (otherwise) with the element type of the target array

The element type of the slowest varying dimension can itself be an array or not.



Francoise



--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Intel Israel (74) Limited



This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for

the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution

by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended

recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Jun 9 17:44:46 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 09 2009 - 17:45:40 PDT