Shalom, Indeed. The proposal hinges on the fact that unpacked array concatenation already stipulates assignment compatibility. Jonathan's proposal is an opportunistic clarification using the existing semantics. Arturo From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:15 PM To: Francoise Martinolle; sv-ec@server.eda.org Subject: [sv-ec] RE: mantis 2380 comment If I understood correctly, one of the points of the proposal is that unpacked array concatenations (10.10) will only require assignment compatibility, as opposed to an array assignment. Shalom ________________________________ From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Francoise Martinolle Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 10:06 PM To: sv-ec@server.eda.org Subject: [sv-ec] mantis 2380 comment Jonathan, in your second proposal: MODIFY the second bullet point of clause 10.10 as follows (insert word "unpacked"): - an item whose self-determined type is an unpacked array whose slowest-varying dimension's element type is assignment compatible with the element type of the target array shall represent as many elements as exist in that item, arranged in the same left-to-right order as they would appear in the array item itself; Should n't it be : whose slowest-varying dimension's element type is assignment comaptible (if array type) or equivalent (otherwise) with the element type of the target array The element type of the slowest varying dimension can itself be an array or not. Francoise -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is believed to be clean. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jun 9 17:44:46 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 09 2009 - 17:45:40 PDT