[sv-ec] RE: mantis 2380 comment

If I understood correctly, one of the points of the proposal is that unpacked array concatenations (10.10) will only require assignment compatibility, as opposed to an array assignment.

Shalom

________________________________
From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Francoise Martinolle
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 10:06 PM
To: sv-ec@server.eda.org
Subject: [sv-ec] mantis 2380 comment

Jonathan,

in your second proposal:


MODIFY the second bullet point of clause 10.10 as follows (insert word "unpacked"):

- an item whose self-determined type is an unpacked array whose slowest-varying dimension's element type is assignment

compatible with the element type of the target array shall represent as many elements as exist in that item, arranged in the

same left-to-right order as they would appear in the array item itself;



Should n't it be :

whose slowest-varying dimension's element type is assignment comaptible (if array type) or equivalent (otherwise) with the element type of the target array

The element type of the slowest varying dimension can itself be an array or not.



Francoise



--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.