RE: [sv-ec] E-mail Ballot Due Wenesday, June 10, 8AM PDT

From: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce_at_.....>
Date: Tue Jun 09 2009 - 11:08:27 PDT

> No on closing 1486

Mantis item 1486 long predates ballot comment 190.  Isn't the motion under vote simply to defer further consideration of ballot comment 190 until some future rev of the standard, not to close 1486?

-- Brad

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Received on Tue Jun 9 11:12:58 2009

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bresticker, Shalom: "RE: [sv-ec] 2380: a proposal requiring element equivalence"
Previous message: Bresticker, Shalom: "[sv-ec] RE: [sv-bc] Array assignment (copy) - overlapping source and target"
In reply to: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "Re: [sv-ec] E-mail Ballot Due Wenesday, June 10, 8AM PDT"
Next in thread: Mark Hartoog: "RE: [sv-ec] E-mail Ballot Due Wenesday, June 10, 8AM PDT"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 09 2009 - 11:13:40 PDT