No on closing 1486; I think the proposal that is there does no harm to any future changes and does help clarify things. Yes on the remainder. Gord. Mehdi Mohtashemi wrote: [...] > 1. Mantis 2693 > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2693 > > Ballot comment #138: Virtual interface in coverpoint? > Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > > 2. Mantis 2598 [this mantis item is duplicate of 2575, but it was decided > to vote on this] > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2598 > > Ballot comment #52 How can class type parameters be accessed? > Close as a duplicate of 2575 > Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > > Ballot comment #64 Access to class type parameters > Close as a duplicate of 2575 > Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > > 3. Mantis 2575 > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2575 > > Ballot comment #50 Is this.<param_name> or handle.<param_name> allowed for > class parameters or local parameters of a class? > Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > > Ballot comment #52 How can class type parameters be accessed? > Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > > Ballot comment #55 Related to specification of hierarchical class methods > for triggerring. > Yes _x_ No ___ Abstain ___ > > Ballot comment #59 can :: or . be applied to access a class parameter or a > param declared inside the class? > Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > > Ballot comment #64 Access to class type parameters > Yes _x_ No ___ Abstain ___ > > 4. Mantis 2608 > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2608 > Ballot Comment #59 :: access and dot access to class value parameters and > local parameters should be allowed > > Now handled by Mantis 2575 > Close as a duplicate of 2575 > Yes _x_ No ___ Abstain ___ > > 5. Mantis 2746 > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2746 > > Ballot comment #113 "others" coverage bin example > Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > > 6. Mantis 2749 > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2749 > > Ballot comment #53 class properties and methods are public > Yes _x_ No ___ Abstain ___ > > 7. Mantis 2750 > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2750 > Ballot comment #121 "expression" should be "constant_expression" > Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > > 8. Mantis 2748 > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2748 > Ballot comment #19 Preponed PLI region not included (but should be removed > from LRM anyway as it does not really exist) > No change required. > See the bug note for an explanation as to why the figure does not need > to be updated. > Yes _x_ No ___ Abstain ___ > > 9. Mantis 2745 > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2745 > Ballot comment #111 impicit coverpoint for cross > An enhancement request > Move to "Status=Resolved, Resolution=Open" and add the following bug note. > > "The committee read and considered this feedback. the committee believes it > is too broad for the scope of the draft to implement at this time but may > be considered for future revisions." > Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > > 10. Mantis 1575 > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1575 > > Ballot comment #105, 110: can we use net in expressions variable or > expresson. > NO change needed. > Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > > > 11. Mantis 2694 > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2694 > Ballot comment #140: this is out of scope of this version. > NO change needed. > Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > > 12. Mantis 1486 > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1486 > > Ballot comment #190: this is out of scope of this version. > NO change needed. > Yes ___ No _X_ Abstain ___ > > > 13. Mantis 2744 > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2744 > Ballot comment #109: > NO change needed. > Yes _X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Jun 8 07:52:39 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 08 2009 - 07:52:57 PDT