RE: [sv-ec] mantis 2607

 Gordon,

That sounds reasonable to add this. I will modify my proposal. Anyone
against this?
Francoise
    '

-----Original Message-----
From: Gordon Vreugdenhil [mailto:gordonv@model.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 10:53 PM
To: Francoise Martinolle
Cc: SV_EC List
Subject: Re: [sv-ec] mantis 2607

Francoise,

I am fine with your proposal for 2607 -- it is a minimal clarification
that such forwards are legal and doesn't open any new issues as far as I
am concerned.

Personally, I would like to see an explicit restriction that use of a
default specialization of a forward parameterized class requires the
explicit #() form.  If there is consensus on that, I'd like to see that
added.  If there is not consensus, I'm willing to leave that issue
unanswered; we can address that in the next PAR.  I would not want any
clarification (via example or otherwise) explicitly allowing the default
without the #() since I think some discussion on that would be valuable.

Gord.

Francoise Martinolle wrote:
> I uploaded a proposal for 2607.
> Francoise
>        '
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by 
> *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is believed to be 
> clean.

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Vreugdenhil                                503-685-0808
Model Technology (Mentor Graphics)                gordonv@model.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.