Re: [sv-ec] mantis 2607

From: Gordon Vreugdenhil <gordonv_at_.....>
Date: Mon Jun 08 2009 - 19:52:56 PDT
Francoise,

I am fine with your proposal for 2607 -- it is a minimal
clarification that such forwards are legal and doesn't open
any new issues as far as I am concerned.

Personally, I would like to see an explicit restriction that
use of a default specialization of a forward parameterized class
requires the explicit #() form.  If there is consensus on that,
I'd like to see that added.  If there is not consensus, I'm
willing to leave that issue unanswered; we can address that in
the next PAR.  I would not want any clarification (via example
or otherwise) explicitly allowing the default without the #()
since I think some discussion on that would be valuable.

Gord.

Francoise Martinolle wrote:
> I uploaded a proposal for 2607.
> Francoise
>        '
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Vreugdenhil                                503-685-0808
Model Technology (Mentor Graphics)                gordonv@model.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Jun 8 19:54:32 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 08 2009 - 19:54:42 PDT