RE: [sv-champions] Re: [sv-ec] email vote concurrently run for both sv-ec and the champions, ending May 27th

I also have Steven's version of ballot comment 55. However it is covered, as noted, by Mantis 2575.

Shalom 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Neil Korpusik
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 4:57 AM
> To: Steven Sharp
> Cc: sv-champions@server.eda.org; sv-ec@server.eda.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-champions] Re: [sv-ec] email vote 
> concurrently run for both sv-ec and the champions, ending May 27th
> 
> It looks like ballot comment #55 and #109 from the original 
> spreadsheet are
> almost identical.
> 
> Ballot comment #109 is covered by mantis 2744. So it looks 
> like we do have
> #55 from the original spreadsheet covered.
> 
> 
> Neil
> 
> 
> 
> On 05/26/09 13:33, Neil Korpusik wrote:
> > Hi Steven,
> > 
> > Is the following what you are showing in your spreadsheet for
> > ballot comment #55?
> > 
> > 
> >    Is a class parameter implicitly "public" and "static"
> >    This is a needed clarification for section 8.17 that is 
> related to 
> > ballot #10
> > 
> > When I compare the original spreadsheet to the spreadsheet 
> that has just 
> > the
> > ballot comments for the sv-ec, I see different text in the 
> "comment" 
> > section
> > for ballot id #55. Line 156 of the original spreadsheet is 
> what I used
> > for the description in the email vote. I'm not sure where 
> the description
> > in the other spreadsheet came from.
> > 
> > My guess is the the ballot comment from the original 
> spreadsheet, line 
> > 156 is not
> > covered by any  of the existing mantis items.
> > 
> > 
> > Neil
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On 05/26/09 12:58, Steven Sharp wrote:
> >> My ballot is attached.
> >>
> >> Steven Sharp
> >> sharp@cadence.com
> >>
> > 
> >  > This description does not match what I have in my 
> spreadsheet for ballot
> >  > comment #55.  The proposal for Mantis 2575 does cover 
> what I see for #55
> >  > in my spreadsheet, so I would vote Yes if the 
> description is changed.
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.