Re: [sv-champions] Re: [sv-ec] email vote concurrently run for both sv-ec and the champions, ending May 27th

It looks like ballot comment #55 and #109 from the original spreadsheet are
almost identical.

Ballot comment #109 is covered by mantis 2744. So it looks like we do have
#55 from the original spreadsheet covered.


Neil



On 05/26/09 13:33, Neil Korpusik wrote:
> Hi Steven,
> 
> Is the following what you are showing in your spreadsheet for
> ballot comment #55?
> 
> 
>    Is a class parameter implicitly "public" and "static"
>    This is a needed clarification for section 8.17 that is related to 
> ballot #10
> 
> When I compare the original spreadsheet to the spreadsheet that has just 
> the
> ballot comments for the sv-ec, I see different text in the "comment" 
> section
> for ballot id #55. Line 156 of the original spreadsheet is what I used
> for the description in the email vote. I'm not sure where the description
> in the other spreadsheet came from.
> 
> My guess is the the ballot comment from the original spreadsheet, line 
> 156 is not
> covered by any  of the existing mantis items.
> 
> 
> Neil
> 
> 
> 
> On 05/26/09 12:58, Steven Sharp wrote:
>> My ballot is attached.
>>
>> Steven Sharp
>> sharp@cadence.com
>>
> 
>  > This description does not match what I have in my spreadsheet for ballot
>  > comment #55.  The proposal for Mantis 2575 does cover what I see for #55
>  > in my spreadsheet, so I would vote Yes if the description is changed.
> 
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.